tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33673692.post3619932183083586957..comments2023-05-26T00:57:16.379-07:00Comments on Bob's Log: Who is a king of the glory?Bob MacDonaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11335631079939764763noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33673692.post-8851543108905224762007-05-31T11:18:00.000-07:002007-05-31T11:18:00.000-07:00Tim: thank you - Your note sounds like an ancient ...Tim: thank you - Your note sounds like an ancient thought process - where the chain is introduced and the 'definite' follows in the aural sequence. This working of the mind in a different sequence is so important to grasp some of the otherness of the communication.Bob MacDonaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11335631079939764763noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33673692.post-86404748484705488412007-05-31T11:13:00.000-07:002007-05-31T11:13:00.000-07:00They general rule is that when the noun in absolut...They general rule is that when the noun in absolute is definite the whole chain is definite (the construct - I think - never takes the "article"), in this case also since this is poetry and the "article" ה is less common in poetry I think it is conclusive it is "the king of glory" or "the glorious king".Tim Bulkeleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07289349880110581469noreply@blogger.com